In total, eleven Urartian rulers are known by own inscriptions. Most of them are also mentioned in Assyrian sources. Two Urartian rulers, namely Aramu and Melarṭua, are only referred to by their Assyrian contemporaries. In addition, three individuals are attested in Urartian sources for whom it remains unclear whether they ruled as king or not.
Lutibri, father of Sarduri I, is solely attested as patronymic in the inscription of Sarduri A 01-01. Clear evidence that he ruled as king is missing. The same is true for Erimena, father of Rusa whose name is not only attested as patronym in inscriptions of his son, but also as the name of the owner of a seal (Sig. 13-01). On the latter he is referred to with the title LÚaṣuli or LÚA.ZU-li which presumably is to be interpreted as title of a government official and not as formerly has been thought as title of the crownprince (see Hellwag 2000 and Hellwag 2005 and her argumentation against the reading LÚA.NIN-li "son of the mistress" = "crownprince"). Inušpua, son of Minua, is mentioned in inscriptions referring to joint activities of Išpuini, his son Minua and his grandson Inušpua. Furthermore, he is mentioned in a dedicatory inscription of his grandfather Išpuini as beneficiary (B 02–04). The attestations make it seem very likely that he was envisaged as successor of his father Minua. It might very well be that he ruled for a short period of time although no inscriptions of his own have not come down to us. It might, however, be that he never ascended the throne, possibly due to a premature death.
Despite the long academic history of Urartology the sequence of Urartian rulers is still a matter of debate. This is mainly due to the nature of the Urartian written sources. In contrast to Babylonia and Assyria there are no Urartian king lists, and the Urartian written sources which came down to us contain only little information about the succession of the rulers. Another problem is that the Assyrian sources simply mention the names of the Urartian rulers without adding patronymics. Since some Urartian rulers had the same name, it is not always clear to which ruler of this name the Assyrian sources refer.
With regard to the royal sequence the most important information in the Urartian texts is the patronymic which frequently follows the name of the ruler. The respective phrase is usually translated as "x, son of y". We must, however, keep in mind that the formula does not necessarily refer to a biological paternity. Since in Urartian the relationship between the two persons is expressed by a suffix -he forming adjectives of appurtenance, the formula might also refer to a legal paternity established by adoption or even another form of descendance. The patronymics are also of great importance to distinguish between rulers of the same name. In some cases, however, the royal sequence remains ambiguous. This is the case with rulers who have not composed own inscriptions but are only referred to in filiation formulae or elsewhere in inscriptions of other rulers. Among them are Erimena, who is only mentioned by his successor Rusa, Sarduri, son of Rusa, and Sarduri, son of Sarduri. According to Salvini, they are all likely to be dated to the second and third quarter of the 7th century and thus the end of the Urartian kingdom (see, e.g., Salvini 1995: 109-117, 207; Salvini 2007: 146-162; Salvini 2008: 23; Salvini 2013: 132-133). Recently, however, several scholars have argued that this chronology is for various reasons unlikely. Besides the patronyms they take the following sources of information into account:
On grounds of this data, the following sequence of the first five Urartian rulers, known by own inscriptions, can be established:
| The first five Urartian rulers, known by own inscriptions | |
|---|---|
| Sarduri I, son of Lutibri | approx. 840-830, contemporary of Shalmaneser III, who refers to him as Seduri, the Urartian |
| Išpuini, son of Sarduri I | approx. 830-810, between 820 and 810 presumably coregency with his son Minua; contemporary of Šamši-Adad V, who refers to him as Ušpina |
| Minua, son of Išpuini | approx. 820-785/780, between 820 and 810 coregency with his father Išpuini; not mentioned in the Assyrian sources |
| Argišti I, son of Minua | approx. 785/780-756, contemporary of Shalmaneser IV, who refers to him as Argištu/I |
| Sarduri II, son of Argišti I | approx. 756-730, contemporary of Aššur-nārārī V (mentioned by Sarduri II), and Tiglath-pileser III, who refers to Sarduri II as Sarduri/Sardaurri |
Table 1: The first five Urartian rulers, known by own inscriptions
The order of the Urartian kings following Sarduri II, son of Argišti I, remains unclear. As Roaf (2012: 187-216) has shown there are several possible scenarios – some more likely than others. Despite differences in detail, most researchers today agree that Rusa, son of Erimena, ruled earlier than assumed by Salvini. Roaf (2012: 214-216) and Kroll (2012: 183-186) consider it as most likely that Rusa, son of Erimena, was a contemporary of Sargon II and maybe also Tiglath-pileser III and ruled earlier than Rusa, son of Sarduri, and Argišti, son of Rusa. By contrast, Fuchs (2012: 148) regards Rusa, son of Erimena, as a contemporary of Sennacherib and places him between Argišti, son of Rusa, and Rusa, son of Argišti.
Similarly, most scholars today agree that Sarduri, son of Sarduri, who is only mentioned on one bronze shield found in Karmir-Blur, is to be dated to the 8th rather than the 7th century (see, e.g., Kroll 1984 and Fuchs 2012: 146).
The following table is to provide an overview of the most notable royal sequences following Sarduri II, son of Argišti I proposed in the scholarly literature.
| Salvini 1995 and Salvini 2008 | Fuchs 2012 | Roaf 2012 (scenario 1A) |
|---|---|---|
| Rusa I, son of Sarduri (contemporary of Sargon II, in Assyrian sources referred to as Ursā and Rusā, approx. 730-713) | Sarduri (III), son of Sarduri (II) | Sarduri, son of Argišti or Sarduri |
| Argišti II, son of Rusa (contemporary of Sargon II, in Assyrian sources referred to as Argišta, 713 –?) | Rusa I, son of Sarduri II or III (contemporary of Sargon II, who refers to him as Ursā and Rusā) | Rusa, son of Erimena (contemporary and opponent of Sargon II) |
| Rusa II, son of Argišti (contemporary of Esarhaddon, before the middle of the 7th cent.) | Argišti II, son of Rusa (contemporary of Sargon II, in Assyrian sources referred to as Argišti/u) | Rusa, son of Sarduri |
| Rusa III, son of Erimena (contemporary of Assurbanipal, in Assyrian sources referred to as Rusā) | Rusa II, son of Erimena (no Assyrian synchronism) | Argišti, son of Rusa |
| Sarduri, son of Rusa III | Rusa III, son of Argišti (in Assyrian sources referred to as Ursā, contemporary of Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal) | Rusa, son of Argišti |
| Sarduri III, son of Sarduri (known from the inscription CTU B 16-1 on a bronze shield from Kamir-Blur, contemporary of Assurbanipal, referred to as Ištar/Issar-dūrī) | Sarduri IV, son of Rusa II or III (contemporary of Assurbanipal, referred to as Ištar/Issar-dūrī) | – |
Table 2: possible sequences of Urartian rulers coming after Sarduri II
In the Electronic Corpus of Urartian Texts (eCUT) the numbering of texts in Salvini's Corpus dei testi Urartei (CTU), Rome 2008–2018 has been kept. The portal pages, however, follow the chronology suggested by Roaf. In case of Rusa, son of Argišti, Rusa, son of Erimena, and Rusa, son of Sarduri, the different theories and sequences are, however, briefly discussed.
Birgit Christiansen
Birgit Christiansen, 'Urartian Rulers and Chronology', Electronic Corpus of Urartian Texts (eCUT) Project, The eCUT Project, 2019 [http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/ecut/urartianrulersandchronology/]