Rusa, son of Erimena

Introduction

Recent studies by Ursula Seidl (2004 and 2007), Andreas Fuchs (2012), Stephan Kroll (2012) and Michael Roaf (2012) suggest that Rusa, son of Erimena, was king before Rusa, son of Argišti II. Fuchs and Roaf in particular refer to Seidl's art historical observations, which provide a sound basis for a relative chronology. However, with regard to the exact positions of the individual rulers of the first half of the 7^th century, their proposals differ with regard to the sequence of Rusa, son of Erimena, Rusa, son of Sarduri, and Rusa, son of Argišti (see portal page "Introduction").

Map showing the distribution of the stone inscriptions of Rusa, son of Erimena, in: Mirjo Salvini, CTU I: 620.

Rusa, son of Erimena, contemporary of Sennacherib?

According to Seidl (2004: 124), the style of the relief bronzes of Rusa, son of Erimena, resembles the style typical for the period of the reigns of Rusa I and his predecessors, while it differs significantly from the style of the reign of Rusa, son of Argišti. This goes along with the similarity of the royal titles of both Argišti II and Rusa, son of Erimena . According to Fuchs, Rusa, son of Erimena, is a contemporary of Sennacherib. His reign probably began in 709 BC (Fuchs 2012: 148), its end, however, is unknown.

Rusa, son of Erimena, contemporary of Sargon II?

According to Roaf (2012), Rusa, son of Erimena, was already in power when Sargon II ascended the throne in 722 BC. The first part of his reign would then have been dedicated to his building projects, among which Rusaḫinili and Ulḫu are most prominent. His reign came to an end in the wake of Sargon's II victory in the battle of Mount Uauš in 714 BC (see portal page "Introduction" for a discussion of the possible scenarios of Rusa's II end).

The present overview refers to Roaf's contribution by seeing Rusa II as the contemporary of Tiglath-pilesar III and Sargon II. Thus, Sargon's II inscriptions provide synchronisms as well as the only textual evidence concerning the occurrences of the Assyrian-Urartian war.

Military activities

The theatre now lay in the East – the Zagros region inhabited by the Manneans. Their domestic political conflicts offered both Sargon II and Rusa I the opportunity to broaden their sphere of influence. Two parties – a pro-Urartian and a pro-Assyrian – struggled for supremacy. The pro-Urartian party, led by Bagdatti of Uišdiš and Metatti of Zikirtu, battled Aza – vassal of Sargon II – and killed him. This eventually led to the battle of Mount Uauš in early summer 714 BC, which took place between Urartian forces and their Mannean allies on the one hand and Assyrian forces on the other hand. Sargon II won the skirmish and thus put an end to Urartian ambitions in the region to the south of Lake Urmia. During his campaign, Sargon II conquered and sacked Muṣaṣir and the temple of the god Ḫaldi. He also claimed that Rusa committed suicide. Despite this, Assyrian sources mention Rusa as ally of Ambaris of Bīt Purutaš just one year later in 713 BC.

Royal Titles

"(I am) Rusa, son of Erimena, mighty king, king of the Bia lands" (CTU 14-1, rev. 27-28).

Building activities

Votives of Rusa, son of Erimena, were only detected in Toprakkale/Rusaḫinili, whereas they are lacking in sites assigned to Rusa, son of Argišti. On these grounds, Seidl suggests that Toprakkale was founded by Rusa, son of Erimena, rather than by Rusa, son of Argišti, as Salvini proposes referring to CB Ba-6 (CTU IV, pl. 198) – a clay bulla – which conveys that Rusa, son of Argišti, set up a throne in Toprakkale/Rusaḫinili in his accession year. Fuchs (2013) argues consequently that the site must have already existed as the coronation of Rusa, son of Argišti, took place there (Fuchs 2013: 147). This finds support in the stele of Keşiş Göl (A 14-01), which reports on the agricultural development of the region Toprakkale/Rusaḫinili. The site's name was later supplemented by the addition "Qilbanikai", i.e. "vis-à-vis Mount Qilbani". This occurred in the time of Rusa, son of Argišti, who built another fortress-residence known by the name "Rusaḫinili Eiduru-kai", i.e. " Rusaḫinili vis-à-vis Mount Eiduru" (A 12-09 ll.1-3).

Agricultural infrastructure and irrigation systems

In A 14-01 and A 14-02, Rusa, son of Erimena, states that the land "in front of Mount Qilbani" was undeveloped. In order to cultivate the region, he built a lake named "Lake of Rusa", fed by "the water of the mighty mountainous land", as well as a canal to service his new foundation of Rusaḫinili. In addition, he planted vineyards, woods and fields of grain.

Rusa_Erimena_Govelek_stele_CTU III_369.jpg

Upper part of the stele from Gövelek with the inscription A 14-1, in: Mirjo Salvini, CTU III: 369.

Rusa_Erimena_Kesis_Gol_stele_CTU III_379b.jpg

Reconstruction by A. Mancini of the Keşiş Göl stele with the two fragments A 14-1 and A 14-2, in: Mirjo Salvini, CTU III: 379.

Religious activities

According to A 14-01 and A 14-02, Rusa, son of Erimena, established a ritual referring to the "Lake of Rusa".

Grain supply

Rusa, son of Erimena, states in his inscriptions A 14-05 and 06 that he filled the silos of two sites, i.e. Erin-berd (A 14-06) and a site so far unknown, with grain (A 14-05). Similar texts are known for Minua, Argišti I and Sarduri (see the respective portal pages).

Inscriptions on metal objects

Bronze objects were found in Toprakkale (B 12-1 to B 12-14), all of which are votive offerings for the god Ḫaldi.